Tags:
Zyll,
That is the point! You cannot prevent inflation without meaningful taxation and the elimination of unnecessary spending. Both parties want their pet programs, but neither wishes to pay for it with taxation.
Okay very well. I must have misread what you said.
Thanks! Steve W said:Zyll,
That is the point! You cannot prevent inflation without meaningful taxation and the elimination of unnecessary spending. Both parties want their pet programs, but neither wishes to pay for it with taxation.

Zyll,
I was actually physically ill to hear the man I worked so hard to elect go down the same military intervention road as Johnson/Bush ! No mention was ever made about how to pay for this. Further, no mention was made about the need for National sacrifice for everyone.
I agree with you; Obama is nothing but an extension of the same policy path started with the assassination of JFK. Eisenhower warned us of this military engine, and it has already bankrupted us. The point I was making was that this spending can only come from taxation, borrowing, or inflation (printing). Taxes have been exhausted as a politically viable means of spending, borrowing is now at a maximum where other countries are starting to refuse to lend out any more, and therefore printing or "monetizing our debt" is the only option left. Thus the contradiction I alluded to: Americans who refuse taxation but keep voting for entitlements and military protection will see inflation as the financing instrument of choice.
So I do think we're talking from the same point of view.
Steve W said:
Zyll,
I was actually physically ill to hear the man I worked so hard to elect go down the same military intervention road as Johnson/Bush ! No mention was ever made about how to pay for this. Further, no mention was made about the need for National sacrifice for everyone.
© 2012 Created by coinnetwork.